Protein-protein interaction networks
Build PPI networks from curated interaction databases, filtered by confidence, to see how your hits physically and functionally connect.
A long gene list tells you what changed; a network tells you how it fits together. We build and analyse biological networks—protein-protein interaction, gene-regulatory, and co-expression—detect the modules inside them, and map results onto pathways, so structure and mechanism come out of the hairball. Reproducible, from documented code.
Most omics analyses end with a ranked list of genes or proteins. Network biology picks up there: it places those hits into the web of interactions, regulation, and co-expression they belong to, so you can see which ones sit at hubs, which cluster into functional modules, and which pathways the changes converge on. A network turns a flat list into testable structure.
We construct the network that fits your question—protein-protein interaction from curated databases, regulatory from expression, or co-expression with WGCNA—then detect modules, run pathway and topology analysis, and prioritise the genes worth following up. This is the graph layer that complements multi-omics integration and biostatistics; we cross-reference those rather than repeat them, and everything ships with version-locked code.
One service spanning the network lifecycle—from constructing the graph through module detection and pathway analysis to prioritisation and visualization.
Build PPI networks from curated interaction databases, filtered by confidence, to see how your hits physically and functionally connect.
Infer directed transcription-factor-to-target relationships from expression, to propose who regulates whom.
Weighted co-expression networks that group genes varying together, relate modules to traits, and surface hub genes.
Map genes and modules onto curated pathways with over-representation, GSEA, and topology-aware methods.
Partition the network into communities and dense sub-networks that behave as functional units.
Propagate signal across the network and rank genes by centrality and proximity to seeds for follow-up.
Combine layers—expression, protein, interaction—into integrative networks using curated prior knowledge.
Publication-quality, navigable network figures and interactive sessions collaborators can explore.
A transparent sequence from inputs to an interpreted, interactive network—the network type and methods chosen for your data, every step documented.
Steps adapt to your project: PPI vs. regulatory vs. co-expression, a single network vs. an integrative one, a static figure vs. an interactive Cytoscape session. We agree the plan with you first.
We agree the question and network type, and gather inputs—a gene or protein list, or an expression matrix for co-expression.
Inputs: gene list · matrix · analysis plan
The network is built—PPI from databases, regulatory from expression, or co-expression—with confidence thresholds set explicitly.
Tools: STRING · WGCNA · GENIE3
We characterise the network—degree, centrality, hubs, connectivity—and check robustness to thresholds.
Tools: igraph · NetworkX
Community-detection algorithms partition the network into functional modules and dense sub-networks.
Methods: Leiden · MCODE · WGCNA
Modules and gene sets are tested against pathway databases, with topology-aware enrichment where useful.
Tools: clusterProfiler · Reactome
Network propagation and centrality rank the genes and links most worth validating experimentally.
Methods: HotNet2 · RWR · centrality
Results become clear network figures and an interactive session, with version-locked code so it reproduces exactly.
Tools: Cytoscape · ggraph · renv
We select from the field's standard toolkit rather than forcing every dataset through one pipeline. A representative set of what we work with:
Networks are only as good as the interactions behind them. We draw on established, versioned resources:
Three network types answer different questions. We choose the one that fits your data—or combine them.
| Dimension | PPI network | Co-expression network | Regulatory network |
|---|---|---|---|
| Built from | Curated interaction databases | An expression matrix across samples | Expression, sometimes motifs/ChIP |
| An edge means | Physical/functional interaction | Correlated expression | Inferred regulation (directed) |
| Needs | A gene/protein list | Many samples (tens+) | Expression + prior knowledge |
| Best for | Contextualising hits, hubs | Modules, hub genes, trait links | Proposing regulators & targets |
Not just a picture of a network—every file you need to explore, publish, and reproduce it.
A network is a hypothesis-generating model, and we treat it as one. Edges are curated or inferred associations with differing evidence—not proof that two molecules physically interact or that one causes another. We report edge confidence and source, keep enrichment honest with an appropriate background and multiple-testing correction, and check that modules are robust rather than artefacts of a threshold.
The practical payoff: you get a defensible network that points to the genes and links worth testing next, with every tool and database version recorded so it reproduces exactly. And we will say plainly when your data is too small, or too few samples, for a co-expression or regulatory network to be reliable.
What researchers most often ask before starting a network project.
Send us your gene or protein lists, or your expression matrix—we'll scope the network analysis and tell you honestly what it can and can't show.