Core Bioinformatics

Genomics & Variant Analysis

From raw reads to an annotated, defensible variant call set. We run whole-genome and whole-exome pipelines for germline and somatic studies—detecting SNVs, indels, copy-number changes, and structural variants—and hand back results documented for publication and review.

FASTQ · BAM/CRAM in VCF · gVCF · BEDPE out Typical turnaround 3–7 days Individual pricing from $149
Sample variant-calling browser view An illustrative genome-browser view showing a read-depth coverage track and a pileup of sequencing reads over a reference position, with a heterozygous single-nucleotide variant highlighted where roughly half the reads carry the alternate allele. variant_report · GRCh38 · PRJ-2026-0842 coverage reads chr7:55191822 T>G SNV · het · AF 0.48
Illustrative sample output reads / REF ALT allele coverage
Overview

Rigorous variant discovery, without the in-house pipeline overhead

Genomics and variant analysis is the process of turning DNA sequencing reads into a trustworthy list of the ways your sample differs from a reference genome—and then making that list interpretable. The hard part is rarely running a single tool; it is assembling a defensible workflow, choosing callers matched to your data and question, controlling false positives, and documenting every decision so the result survives peer review.

We build and run that workflow for you. Whether you are a PhD researcher with one exome or an industry team with a tumour cohort, we align, process, call, filter, and annotate your data using established, peer-reviewed tools and GATK Best Practices—never opaque in-house black boxes—and return results with the tool versions and parameters recorded for full reproducibility.

Capabilities

What we analyse

One service spanning the full range of DNA variation—from single bases to whole-chromosome rearrangements, germline and somatic.

Germline variant calling

SNVs and indels from WGS or WES, with single-sample, trio, and joint-genotyped cohort workflows for inherited and rare-disease studies.

HaplotypeCaller · DeepVariant · gVCF

Somatic & tumour profiling

Matched tumour-normal and tumour-only mutation calling with panel-of-normals and population filtering to isolate true somatic events.

Mutect2 · Strelka2 · VarScan2

Structural variant detection

Deletions, duplications, inversions, and translocations resolved from split-read, discordant-pair, and assembly-based evidence.

Manta · DELLY · LUMPY

Copy-number analysis

Genome-wide gains and losses called from read-depth and allele-fraction modelling, with segmentation and amplification/deletion classification.

CNVkit · GATK4 CNV · ControlFREEC

Annotation & interpretation

Functional consequence, population frequency, and pathogenicity evidence layered onto every call so a variant list becomes a shortlist.

VEP · SnpEff · ANNOVAR

Long-read genomics

Structural variants, phasing, repeat expansions, and difficult-region resolution from Oxford Nanopore and PacBio HiFi reads.

minimap2 · Sniffles · Flye

De novo assembly

Reference-free genome reconstruction and quality assessment for novel or non-model organisms lacking a good reference.

SPAdes · Hifiasm · QUAST

Cohort & population genomics

Joint callsets, GWAS-ready genotype matrices, and relatedness, ancestry, and sample-QC checks across many samples.

GenotypeGVCFs · PLINK · bcftools

The Pipeline

How a variant analysis runs

A transparent, best-practice sequence—each step chosen for your data type and documented in the final report. Nothing is a black box.

Steps are adapted to your design: germline vs. somatic, short- vs. long-read, single sample vs. cohort. We confirm the plan with you before any compute begins.

Quality control & trimming

Raw-read QC, adapter and quality trimming, and a per-sample quality summary before anything downstream.

Tools: FastQC · MultiQC · fastp · Trimmomatic

Alignment to reference

Reads mapped to GRCh38, T2T-CHM13, or your organism's genome—short-read or long-read aligners as appropriate.

Tools: BWA-MEM2 · Bowtie2 · minimap2

Post-alignment processing

Duplicate marking, base-quality score recalibration, and coverage/insert-size metrics to prepare clean alignments.

Tools: Picard · GATK BQSR · Samtools · mosdepth

Variant calling

Germline or somatic SNV/indel calling, plus dedicated structural-variant and copy-number callers when your study needs them.

Tools: HaplotypeCaller · DeepVariant · Mutect2 · Manta

Filtering & recalibration

VQSR or hard filters, panel-of-normals and tumour-normal subtraction, and frequency filters to control false positives.

Tools: GATK VQSR · bcftools · gnomAD frequency filters

Annotation & interpretation

Consequence prediction and evidence layering against public databases, then prioritisation toward your biological question.

Tools: Ensembl VEP · SnpEff · ANNOVAR · dbNSFP

Reporting & delivery

Annotated tables, a prioritised shortlist, QC report, IGV session, and publication-ready methods with every tool version.

Tools: IGV · MultiQC · versioned methods manifest

Tools & Technologies

Established, peer-reviewed tools—matched to your data

We select from the field's standard toolkit rather than forcing every dataset through one pipeline. A representative set of what we work with:

Read QC & preprocessing

FastQC MultiQC fastp Trimmomatic Cutadapt

Alignment & processing

BWA-MEM2 Bowtie2 minimap2 Picard Samtools GATK BQSR mosdepth Qualimap

Germline SNV/indel calling

GATK HaplotypeCaller DeepVariant FreeBayes bcftools call

Somatic calling

Mutect2 Strelka2 VarScan2 MuSE SomaticSniper

Structural & copy-number

Manta DELLY LUMPY SvABA GATK-SV CNVkit ControlFREEC Sniffles

Annotation & signatures

Ensembl VEP SnpEff ANNOVAR SnpSift bcftools csq SigProfiler

Assembly & long-read

SPAdes Flye Hifiasm QUAST BUSCO

Benchmarking & review

hap.py GIAB truth sets vcfeval IGV
Reference Resources

Public knowledge behind every annotation

Calls are only as useful as the context around them. We annotate against the community's authoritative, versioned resources.

dbSNP
Reference catalogue of known short variants for labelling and cross-referencing calls.
gnomAD
Population allele frequencies across genomes and exomes for rarity filtering.
ClinVar
Curated clinical-significance assertions to support variant interpretation.
COSMIC
Catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer for tumour-focused studies.
1000 Genomes & TOPMed
Population reference panels for frequency context and imputation.
dbNSFP
Aggregated in-silico predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, CADD, REVEL) in one resource.
Ensembl / RefSeq / GENCODE
Gene models and transcript annotation underlying consequence calls.
GWAS Catalog
Curated trait- and disease-associated variants for downstream context.
GIAB (NIST) truth sets
Gold-standard benchmarks used to validate pipeline sensitivity and precision.
Choosing a Design

WGS vs. WES vs. targeted panel

There is no single best design—only the right one for your question and budget. A quick orientation; we will help you decide.

General comparison for research variant analysis. Exact depth and cost depend on organism, sample type, and goals.
Dimension Whole-Genome (WGS) Whole-Exome (WES) Targeted Panel
Genomic scope Entire genome, incl. intronic, intergenic & regulatory regions Protein-coding exons (~1–2% of the genome) A defined gene set or region of interest
Typical depth ~30× (germline); higher for somatic ~100× over targeted exons 500×–1000×+ for low-frequency variants
Variant types resolved SNVs, indels, CNVs, SVs, repeats, mitochondrial SNVs and indels in coding regions (CNV with care) SNVs/indels within the panel; deep, sensitive
Relative cost Highest per sample; most data Moderate; strong coverage-per-dollar for coding variants Lowest per sample at scale
Best suited to Discovery, structural/non-coding variation, novel genomes Mendelian & rare-disease coding-variant studies Known genes, screening, and deep somatic detection
What You Receive

A complete, documented deliverable

Not just a VCF dropped in a folder—every output you need to analyse, publish, and reproduce the work.

  • Aligned reads (BAM/CRAM), duplicate-marked and recalibrated
  • Variant calls in standards-compliant VCF / gVCF
  • Structural & copy-number calls (VCF / BEDPE / segments)
  • Annotated, filterable variant tables (TSV / XLSX)
  • Prioritised candidate shortlist for your question
  • QC & coverage report with per-sample metrics
  • Publication-ready methods text with tool versions

Built for reproducibility, not just a result

Every pipeline follows documented best practices, and we validate against Genome in a Bottle reference material where it applies, so sensitivity and precision are known rather than assumed. Each run records its tool versions, parameters, and reference builds.

The practical payoff: your methods section writes itself, a reviewer can re-run the analysis, and a result from today can be reproduced a year from now. We will also tell you honestly when a design or sample won't support the conclusion you're after.

FAQ

Genomics & variant analysis questions

What researchers and project leads most often ask before starting a genomics project.

WES targets the protein-coding exome at lower cost and suits Mendelian and coding-variant studies. WGS covers the whole genome — including regulatory, intergenic, and structural regions that exome capture misses. We help you match the design to your biological question and budget.
Single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), small insertions and deletions (indels), copy-number variants (CNVs), and larger structural variants (SVs) such as deletions, duplications, inversions, and translocations — in both germline and somatic (tumour) contexts.
Yes. We run matched tumour-normal and tumour-only somatic calling with callers such as Mutect2 and Strelka2, apply a panel-of-normals and population filters to suppress false positives, and can add copy-number and mutational-signature analysis.
Yes. Long reads span repeats and complex regions, so we use them for structural-variant discovery, phasing, difficult-region resolution, and de novo assembly of novel or non-model genomes, alongside or instead of short-read data.
We start from raw reads (FASTQ) or aligned data (BAM/CRAM) and return standards-compliant VCF and gVCF, BEDPE, and annotated tables. If you only have sequencing files from your core facility and a reference, that is enough to begin.
We follow GATK Best Practices, benchmark against Genome in a Bottle reference sets where relevant, and record every tool and version in the report so your methods section and any reviewer re-run are fully reproducible.

Have sequencing data ready to analyse?

Tell us your organism, data type, and question—we'll scope it honestly, including if a different design would serve you better.