Somatic variant calling
Tumor-normal and tumor-only somatic SNV and indel calling with panel-of-normals filtering, tuned for low allele fractions.
Cancer is a genomic disease, and its data is uniquely demanding—somatic signal buried in noise, tumor heterogeneity, and subclonal evolution. We bring the computational depth to make sense of it: somatic variants, copy-number, signatures, ctDNA, and single-cell heterogeneity, for research and clinical research.
Cancer genomes break the assumptions ordinary pipelines make. Somatic mutations sit at low allele fractions against a normal background; tumors are mixtures of evolving subclones; copy-number and structural rearrangements reshape whole chromosomes; and purity and ploidy confound every measurement. Getting real biology out of this needs methods built for cancer—and the judgement to know when a signal is a driver, an artifact, or a passenger.
We bring that depth to your cancer data. From tumor-normal somatic calling and copy-number profiling to mutational signatures, ctDNA, and single-cell tumor heterogeneity, we apply established, peer-reviewed methods against the field's reference cohorts and knowledge bases—and return results documented for reproducibility. This is research and clinical-research work, not a diagnostic service: clinical decisions stay with treating oncologists and accredited laboratories.
The computational analyses that turn tumor sequencing into biology—from somatic calling to single-cell heterogeneity and immunogenomics.
Tumor-normal and tumor-only somatic SNV and indel calling with panel-of-normals filtering, tuned for low allele fractions.
Allele-specific copy-number, purity and ploidy estimation, and structural-variant and fusion detection across the tumor genome.
Tumor mutational burden, microsatellite-instability status, and SBS/ID/DBS mutational-signature deconvolution against COSMIC.
Subclonal reconstruction and clonal-evolution analysis to map tumor heterogeneity and how it changes over time or treatment.
Error-corrected, UMI-aware detection of low-frequency variants for tumor profiling and minimal-residual-disease research.
Single-cell RNA analysis for tumor and immune-cell states, plus deconvolution of the tumor microenvironment from bulk data.
HLA typing, neoantigen prediction, and TCR/BCR repertoire analysis to study tumor–immune interactions and immunotherapy response.
Significantly mutated genes, driver detection, and pathway-level analysis to move from a mutation list to cancer biology.
A transparent, cancer-aware sequence from tumor reads to interpreted biology—each step tuned for somatic signal and documented for reproducibility.
Adapted to your study: tumor-normal vs. tumor-only, WGS vs. panel vs. ctDNA, DNA-only vs. paired RNA and single-cell. We confirm the plan with you before any compute begins.
Tumor and matched-normal raw reads are quality-checked—coverage, contamination, and tumor-in-normal—before analysis.
Tools: FastQC · MultiQC · VerifyBamID
Reads are aligned and prepared—duplicate marking, base recalibration, and, for ctDNA, UMI consensus.
Tools: BWA-MEM2 · GATK · fgbio
SNVs and indels are called against the normal (or a panel-of-normals), then filtered for artifacts and germline leakage.
Tools: Mutect2 · Strelka2 · PoN
Allele-specific copy-number, purity and ploidy, and structural variants and fusions across the tumor genome.
Tools: FACETS · Manta · GRIDSS
Variants are annotated and linked to cancer knowledge bases; significantly mutated genes and drivers are identified.
Tools: VEP · OncoKB · dNdScv
Mutational signatures are deconvolved, and tumor mutational burden and microsatellite-instability status are computed.
Tools: SigProfiler · MSIsensor
Results become an oncoprint, signature and copy-number figures, tables, and reproducible methods with every tool version.
Tools: maftools · ComplexHeatmap · versioned manifest
We select from the field's standard toolkit rather than forcing every dataset through one pipeline. A representative set of what we work with:
Cancer analysis is powered by the field's reference cohorts and knowledge bases. We build on the community's authoritative, versioned resources.
Different sample setups give different somatic confidence. A quick orientation; we will help you match it to your study.
| Dimension | Tumor-normal | Tumor-only | ctDNA / liquid biopsy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input | Tumor + matched normal | Tumor tissue only | Cell-free DNA from blood |
| Somatic confidence | Highest—germline subtracted | Good, with PoN & filters | High with UMI error-correction |
| Allele fractions | Clonal & subclonal | Clonal & subclonal | Very low (down to ~0.1%) |
| Watch for | Needs a normal sample | Germline leakage | Low input; sampling |
| Best suited to | Definitive somatic profiling | Archival / no-normal cohorts | Monitoring & MRD research |
Not just a VCF dropped in a folder—a coherent picture of the tumor, documented so it reproduces and stands up to review.
Cancer analysis follows documented best practices—matched-normal subtraction or panel-of-normals filtering, artifact removal, purity and ploidy correction, and reference cohorts and knowledge-base versions all pinned—so a called driver is real signal, not a mapping artifact or a germline variant in disguise. This is research and clinical-research work that your team interprets; it is not a clinical diagnostic service and not a medical diagnosis, and treatment decisions and clinical reporting remain with treating oncologists and accredited laboratories.
The practical payoff: your methods section writes itself, a reviewer can re-run the analysis, and a result from today can be reproduced a year from now. We will also tell you honestly when a design or sample size won't support the conclusion you're after.
What cancer researchers and oncology teams most often ask before starting.
Tell us your organism, data type, and question—we'll scope it honestly, including if a different design would serve you better.