Genome assembly & annotation
De novo assembly of non-model genomes to chromosome scale, with completeness assessment and gene and repeat annotation.
From a wild genome no one has assembled to a breeding program spanning thousands of individuals—non-model biology brings its own hard problems. We bring the computational depth to match: genome assembly, population genomics, phylogenomics, selection scans, and genomic selection, for research.
Most genomics tooling assumes a polished reference genome and a human-shaped problem. Agriculture and evolutionary biology rarely offer either. Genomes are often large, repetitive, and polyploid; references may not exist; sampling spans hundreds of individuals across populations and environments; and the questions—diversity, adaptation, ancestry, breeding value—need population-scale and comparative methods rather than single-sample pipelines.
We work across that whole space. From de novo assembly and annotation of non-model genomes to population genomics, phylogenomics, selection scans, genomic selection, and conservation genetics, we apply established, peer-reviewed methods at population scale—and return results documented for reproducibility. Where we estimate breeding values or selection signals, we are clear that these are research predictions: they need validation, and field performance also depends on environment and management.
The computational analyses that span assembly to breeding—from non-model genomes and population structure to selection and comparative genomics.
De novo assembly of non-model genomes to chromosome scale, with completeness assessment and gene and repeat annotation.
Diversity and differentiation statistics, population structure, admixture, and effective-population-size estimation.
Orthology inference, gene and species trees, and comparative genomics across many taxa, including synteny.
Genome scans for selection, environmental-association analysis, and molecular-evolution tests of adaptation.
GWAS and genomic-selection models to estimate breeding values (GEBVs)—research predictions, not guaranteed outcomes.
Runs of homozygosity, inbreeding, and effective-population-size estimation to inform conservation research.
Graph pangenome construction and structural-variation analysis to capture diversity a single reference misses.
eDNA and metabarcoding analysis for species identification and biodiversity assessment from environmental samples.
A transparent, organism-agnostic sequence from raw data to interpreted biology—each step suited to your species and question and documented for reproducibility.
Adapted to your study: reference vs. de novo, WGS vs. RAD/GBS, single population vs. many taxa, diversity vs. breeding. We confirm the plan with you before any compute begins.
Raw reads are quality-checked—quality, adapters, contamination, and ploidy and genome-size estimation.
Tools: fastp · GenomeScope · MultiQC
A genome is assembled and annotated, or reads aligned to a reference, with completeness assessed by BUSCO.
Tools: hifiasm · BWA-MEM2 · BRAKER
Variants are called across individuals—including RAD-seq/GBS genotyping—then filtered for quality and missingness.
Tools: GATK · Stacks · bcftools
Diversity, differentiation, structure, and admixture are estimated across populations and samples.
Tools: ANGSD · ADMIXTURE · PCA
Depending on the goal: selection scans, phylogenomic trees, or genomic-selection breeding-value models.
Tools: SweeD · IQ-TREE · rrBLUP
Signals are placed in comparative and functional context—orthology, synteny, gene families, and enrichment.
Tools: OrthoFinder · CAFE · synteny
Results become structure plots, trees, synteny and selection figures, tables, and reproducible methods with every tool version.
Tools: ggplot2 · R · versioned manifest
We select from the field's standard toolkit rather than forcing every dataset through one pipeline. A representative set of what we work with:
Cross-species analysis is powered by reference genomes, ortholog sets, and biodiversity databases. We build on the community's authoritative, versioned resources.
Different strategies trade cost against completeness. A quick orientation; we will help you match it to your study.
| Dimension | RAD-seq / GBS | WGS resequencing | De novo assembly |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genome coverage | Reduced-representation | Whole genome, needs reference | Builds the reference |
| Cost / sample | Lowest—many samples | Moderate | Highest, per genome |
| Reference needed | Optional | Yes | No |
| Resolves SVs | No | Partially | Yes |
| Best suited to | Large population & breeding panels | Diversity & selection scans | New species & pangenomes |
Not just a VCF dropped in a folder—a coherent picture of your organisms and populations, documented so it reproduces.
Population-scale analysis follows documented best practices—ploidy and genome-size checks, careful variant filtering and relatedness control, assembly completeness assessed by BUSCO, and reference and database versions pinned—so a selection signal or a structure result is real signal, not a filtering artifact or reference bias. Where we estimate breeding values or predictive models, we are explicit that these are research predictions with a stated accuracy: they need independent validation, and real-world field or population outcomes also depend on environment, management, and factors outside the genome, so we make no guarantees.
The practical payoff: your methods section writes itself, a reviewer can re-run the analysis, and a result from today can be reproduced a year from now. We will also tell you honestly when a design or sample size won't support the conclusion you're after.
What plant, animal, and evolutionary-biology teams most often ask before starting.
Tell us your organism, data type, and question—we'll scope it honestly, including if a different design would serve you better.